Discovered in 1929 in a palace in Istanbul, the Piri Reis map is a mystery that fascinates historians and cartographers. Created in 1513 by the Ottoman admiral and cartographer Piri Reis, this map is one of the few to have survived from the 15th century. It depicts the coasts of Europe, North Africa, Brazil, and several Atlantic islands. Although it is largely accurate, some of its details are so surprising that they have led to bold theories about the knowledge of ancient civilizations. The greatest mystery is the presence of a coast that appears to correspond to Antarctica, even though the continent was not officially discovered until 300 years later.
The History of the Map
The Ottoman admiral Piri Reis was a meticulous cartographer and scholar. He stated that his map was a compilation of about 20 source maps, some of which came from explorers of the time, such as Christopher Columbus. The map is astonishingly accurate for its era, and it has remained an enigma for centuries because it depicts areas that should not have been known to Europeans at that time. It was preserved in the Topkapi Palace in Istanbul until its rediscovery in the early 20th century.
The Great Mystery
The greatest mystery of the Piri Reis map lies in its depiction of the American continent. It shows the coast of Brazil with great precision, but, most importantly, it shows a landmass south of South America that strangely resembles Antarctica. Even more bizarre, this landmass is depicted as if it were not covered in ice, with detailed relief. If this part is indeed Antarctica, it would mean that someone mapped the continent before the start of its current glaciation cycle, which dates back millions of years. This observation has fueled theories of a lost advanced civilization or unknown ancient knowledge.
Expert Theories
Theory #1: The Compilation of Ancient Maps
This theory is the most accepted by historians. It argues that Piri Reis, as a scholar and cartographer, compiled and synthesized knowledge from very diverse and very ancient sources, some of which may date back to lost civilizations. The fact that some source maps are very accurate and others are much less so suggests a variety of origins, some potentially based on direct observations made before glacial periods, which could explain the depiction of Antarctica.
Theory #2: A Cartographic Error
Another theory is that the supposed depiction of Antarctica is simply a cartographic error or a distortion of the coasts of South America. The map's outline is not perfect, and some experts believe that the southern landmass is actually a distorted extension of Patagonia or a projection error of the Falkland Islands. However, the accuracy of other details on the map makes this theory less credible.
The Enigma Persists
Although most historians agree that the Piri Reis map is a masterpiece of compilation, the mystery of its accuracy and its most bizarre details remains. It continues to be a subject of fascination, reminding us that the knowledge of our ancestors may have been more advanced than we think.